Nevertheless, to date no mechanism of action has been identified between radiofrequencies and cells for non-thermal exposure levels. Likewise, the level of epidemiological proof concerning the excess risk of certain tumours remains very limited. In contrast, a significant number of studies do not report any particular effect. On the whole, the level of evidence is not sufficient to accept, as is, that the detrimental effects to health have been conclusively established. For Afsset, they constitute undeniable signals.
Faced with all the doubts regarding the possible dangers from this form of radiation AFSSET recommends the following:
Developing research to clear up the remaining doubts and remain on the look-out for new emerging signals.
Reducing exposure to the public – they quote there is potential to reduce exposure to radiofrequencies. This exposure is part of an environmental rationale, where as soon as exposure can be reduced, it must be contemplated.
It makes sense to reduce your personal exposure to radiofrequencies – in homes your mobile phones, cordless phones and WiFi are the biggest potential sources of radio frequency radiation. There are many ways to reduce your exposure by simply switching off your mobile phone and WiFi (when not in use) and by using a low radiation cordless phone such at the Orchid LR.
To read full AFSSET press release click the following link French angency 09_10_ED_Radiofrequences__CP_EV[1]




